No, this isn't
a play about a band, and its character H isn't a comment
on the demise of twinkle-toed poppers Steps. Instead,
he's an opportunistic professional criminal, a Mancunian
deal-maker with the gift of the gab. But, part-comedy,
part-thriller, On Tour is as generically confused as this
wannabe gangster.
H and Daz meet
in a European prison cell, both casually protesting their
innocence against charges of football hooliganism. But
in humorous dialogue, H quite freely admits to other crimes
that sponge off hooligan culture - drug smuggling and
counterfeit money. The first scene sets up the politics
of the play, but at times its characters feel like mouthpieces
for Gregory Burke's political critique. The so-far timid
Daz suddenly explodes in a vehement outburst against war,
which also exposes his xenophobia. He proudly declares
that he 'loves fighting', but, having recently served
in the Royal Navy, is terrified of being sent to Iraq.
And though H doesn't appear the brightest bulb in the
chandelier, he reveals sharp and self-conscious observations
about imperial exploitation. Young, working class men
are expelled from society - fighting wars abroad - to
maintain social stability at home; but abroad, Britons
thrive by dividing and conquering, to exploit 'the other'.
On Tour comments
on our country's enduring and self-sustaining cultural
position of exploitation. The ramifications of Imperial
Britain and its patriarchal structure still resonate -
the Empire continues to spawn angry young men. Daz, H
and Ray are all unashamed criminals, with fragile loyalties
towards each other; they mask their identities in self-defence,
but become 'fucked in the end because of other people'.
The national model of power-over serves as a process for
individual relationships and identification - self is
defined through oppression of other. But Burke fudges
his politics by attempting to thrill his audiences with
the theatrical equivalent of a Guy Ritchie film.
In the second
scene, recently released H and Daz are joined by the more
seasoned drug-smuggler Ray, a partner of H's, who desperately
needs to disappear and escape from his corrupt business
in the UK. Ray needs H for a fake passport; H needs Daz
to fight off trouble; and Daz needs both of them so he
can rip them off. The shifts in power are carefully played
out. H and Ray had planned to exploit Daz as a naive underdog,
but wielding 20 kilos of Charlie, Ray's fake passport
and H's gun, Daz finally turns the tables on his exploiters.
After an attention-seeking amount of coke-snorting, On
Tour's sharper second half becomes increasingly violent,
but, despite the set's edgy design, it lacks the chic
fierceness I suspect Burke and director Matt Wilde were
aiming for.
The over-long
opening scene is packed with dialogue and deprived of
dramatic intrigue, lending little climactic development
towards the pseudo-thriller ending. Structurally, the
play's journey only really begins with the arrival of
Ray, who generates the dramatic intensity and conflict.
With commanding stage presence, Andrew Schofield's steely
but vulnerable Ray launches energy into the production
- but too late. Schofield's character is also the most
intriguing because he uncovers a weakness; forever distanced
from the guarded Daz and H, we lose interest in them.
Neither funny
nor gripping enough for its blows to bear impact, On Tour
is subject matter in search of a play.
Rhona
Foulis
Culture Wars - 18th October 2005
|